By John Perna
THE STOOL PIGEON SNITCH /GOVERNMENT SHILL
THE STOOL PIGEON SNITCH /GOVERNMENT SHILL
There are always a few convicted criminals, who want to get out of jail by working for the government. A search for court records will often discover the convictions of these stool pigeon snitches.
A convicted criminal; whose actions fit the patterns described herein, is almost certain to be working for government. If that person is a close ally of other government disinformers, then all doubt is removed.
Often you will be able to see the specific rewards that these stool pigeon snitches are receiving for their work.
An example would be an incredibly short sentence for a very serious crime. Stool pigeon snitches might have served only a few months, out of a sentence of many years. Stool pigeon snitches might have had charges mysteriously dropped.
One of these stool pigeon snitches was sentenced to FOUR YEARS in prison, for a drug violation, in Denver, COLORADO but only served 5 months.
One of these stool pigeon snitches, was charged with felony threatening of the President, in Owen County Indiana, but mysteriously got the charges dropped all together.
One of these stool pigeon snitches is a convicted rapist;who only served FOUR MONTHS.
Of course the stool pigeon snitch/GOVERNMENT SHILL will always adhere to the GOLDEN RULE OF DISINFORMERS:
Always accuse your adversary of whatever is true about yourself.
IT WILL BE QUITE CLEAR WHO IT IS, THAT DOES THESE THINGS, IF YOU JUST THINK ABOUT IT.
It is a common tactic of FBI COINTELPRO to try to be THE FIRST ONE MAKE THE ACCUSATION.
If there is a DISINFORMER on this list, he is now asked to demonstrate THE GOLDEN RULE OF DISINFORMERS by accusing me of whatever is true about himself.
If you will study the tactics used by the FBI COINTELPRO program.THEN you will recognize FBI COINTELPRO immediately.
Visit:
Take note of the following paragraph:
"The FBI COINTELPRO program was initiated in 1956. Its purpose, as described later by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, was "to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize activities" of those individuals and organizations whose ideas or goals he opposed. Tactics included: falsely labeling individuals as informants; infiltrating groups with persons instructed to disrupt the group; sending anonymous or forged letters designed to promote strife between groups; initiating politically motivated IRS investigations; carrying out burglaries of offices and unlawful wiretaps; and disseminating to other government agencies and to the media unlawfully obtained derogatory information on individuals and
groups."
groups."
If you understand the meaning of the tactic "to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize activities" you will understand that the person who is most likely of being a Fed, is the one who involves patriots in activities that have no effect on those who are building tyranny, and activities that will destroy the credibility of the patriots.
Those who are building tyranny would love to convince people that we are all a bunch of paranoid nuts, so that we will we unable to warn people about the building of tyranny.
Those who are building tyranny would be more capable of convincing people that we are paranoid nuts, if they could convince a segment of the patriots to run around telling people that the clouds, and the street signs, are out to get us, or that we should ban water.
If you understand the meaning of the tactic "infiltrating groups with persons instructed to disrupt the group; sending anonymous or forged letters designed to promote strife between groups" OR OF: "disseminating to other government agencies and to the media unlawfully obtained derogatory information on individuals and groups."
THEN you will know that a campaign of personal attacks on the real patriots is a part of the FBI COINTELPRO program.
If you understand the meaning of the tactic of falsely labeling individuals as informants THEN you will know that the person;who is most likely to be a fed, is the one who calls the real patriot a fed.
You will notice that no one's name is mentioned in this. If there is anyone who thinks that this description accurately applies to himself, that person is invited to comment.